for Virginia Lt. Gov - Mike Signer

  • : Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/file.inc on line 895.
  • : Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/file.inc on line 895.
  • : Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/file.inc on line 895.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • warning: Parameter 1 to profile_load_profile() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/module.inc on line 450.
  • warning: Parameter 1 to profile_load_profile() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/module.inc on line 450.
  • warning: Parameter 1 to profile_load_profile() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/module.inc on line 450.
  • warning: Parameter 1 to profile_load_profile() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/dempac/bluecommonwealth.com/includes/module.inc on line 450.

We have three statewide offices in Virginia this year. Most of the attention in the blogosphere has gone to the increasingly heated Democratic primary among Brian Moran, Terry McAuliffe and Creigh Deeds for Governor. We have only one candidate so far (with the opportunity to file only a few weeks away ) for Attorney General, Steve Shannon. We have four declared candidates for Lieutenant Governor - Jon Bowerbank, Pat Edmonson, Mike Signer, and Jody Wagner. I am fortunate to know all four to varying degrees. I have decided to support the last to join the race, Mike Signer. In this piece I will offer my reasoning. Mike has known since Friday March 20 that I was going to endorse him. He has no prior knowledge of my reasoning. And I have contacted all three of the other candidates to let them know I would be endorsing someone else, but that I wished them well.

I originally planned to stay neutral in this race as I have in the top spot. It was only after Signer got in the race that I began to consider if maybe I might be willing to make a commitment. I had several opportunities to talk with him, to observe him interact with others, including at a book event. And I read and reviewed the recently published book he produced from his dissertation. In the process I began to see how his mind worked, and that began to intrigue me.

Many people might be dismissive of someone running for Lt. Gov - a position with little formal power beyond presiding over the state senate - whose most recent major political position had been as a foreign policy advisor to a failed presidential candidate. Yes, he also had a politics and policy position with a Congressional candidate who won - Tom Perriello. But Mike does not see things in separate vertical stovepipes. His book on demagogues is in part about foreign policy, but also in part about understanding aspects of the American experiment in democracy. And as a teacher of government, I found the book quite useful in thinking about the deficiencies in our national approach to civic education.

I have talked with several people formally supporting Mike Signer, and a number of others still officially neutral but whom off the record will admit being drawn to his candidacy. People of whom I think highly have good things to say about Mike. And he has experience and connections around the state. That includes service with Governor Mark Warner in the counsel’s office, with the state party doing voter protection work, with the legislature as an assistant to Creigh Deeds, and as noted with the recent successful campaign in which Tom Perriello unseated longtime Congressman Virgil Goode. He even did research for Steve Shannon, our candidate for Attorney General, when Steve first ran for the House of Delegates. I would argue that Mike Signer has as much experience around the different parts of the state and in different aspects of government and politics as any of his competitors, perhaps even more. Thus even though he lacks the name recognition of a former high executive branch appointee and Congressional candidate (Wagner) or the elective experience the other two rivals (Edmonson on Virginia Beach School Board and Bowerbank on Russell County Board), he is more than ready to compete statewide both in the primary and against incumbent Republican Bill Bolling in November.

But that is not why I decided to actively support Mike Signer. What draws me is how I see him using the office and the few staffers to which he is officially entitled. Beyond the normal constituent and liaison work,I expect him to use the office almost as a government think tank - exploring ideas and policies, reaching out to public and private sectors in Virginia, getting people involved in thinking about policy, and touching base with creative efforts in other states. Mike is interested in ideas and the policy implications that flow therefrom. And lord knows the Old Dominion could use some serious intellectual exploration when not directly under the gun to produce immediate results, which I think is a fair description of what any Virginia governor faces, given the limitation of one four-year term for that office.

One important point about such an approach to the office of LG is that it is a model that works regardless of the party of the Governor or the control of the state senate. While the latter will likely continue in Democratic hands at least until the legislature meets after the election of 2011, and while I surely hope that Tim Kaine will be succeeded by someone from our party, I see Mike able to use his approach to the office regardless of who runs the government.

That appeals to me. First, I am interested in ideas and the policies that flow from them, not merely because I teach government to high school students,but because I care deeply about this nation, both in the short term and for the time long past when my own life has ended. Without that perspective I probably would not teach, because I will not, in my 60s, live to see all the results of what I do now with students, most of whom are tenth graders. But it is more than that. I think it is important from time to time that we step back and reexamine the assumptions by which we operate. One needs to understand the political process, have a sense of history, and the capability of seeing possibilities even when others may be dismissive of such things. Perhaps those others will point to failed previous attempts without fully examining how the times might be more conducive to such an approach or an idea. Mike knows the history, having been around Virginia politics,but he also knows previous history does not rigidly bind how we can choose to act now, no matter how much respect we may give to traditions.

Mike Signer is not a hothouse intellectual. He has participated in the rough and tumble of politics for most of his adult life. He understands that there are limits to what one might be able to achieve politically. He also knows that unless we are willing to think well beyond present practice, we will only make incremental change that may be insufficient for the challenges we face.

Mike has a core set of beliefs,revolving around a concept of constitutionalism that he derives in part from studying the work of Hannah Arendt. He writes in In his book that Arendt came to realize that you defeat a demagogue with

a culture of of individual self-reliance, the gift and the radical responsibility of the individual burden of political choice, and the cultivation of a constitutional conscience in the hearts and minds of citizens.

He warns that by itself democracy is

like a body without a soul. What powers a successful constitutional democracy is a constitutional conscience among the people

. Several sentences on p.210 give a sense of how he thinks this should play out in a democratic context:

In the end, constitutionalism is about ordinary people doing ordinary things in their ordinary lives to an extraordinary end.

But constitutionalism isn’t about laws, precisely - it's about the spirit that underlies those laws.

That spirit requires the involvement of the people. And I sense that Mike Signer would like to use the office of Lieutenant Governor of Virginia to reignite a sense of Constitutionalism, of the involvement of “We, the people” in the meaningful governance of our republic. Perhaps after the election of Barack Obama, we as a nation are again ready to explore the meaning of a democratic republic, and to recall Franklin’s response to the question of what kind of government the Philadelphia convention had created: A republic, if you can keep it. For too long government has been done to us in the name of being for us. I think there is another path we can and should follow, and I can see that in the outlook of Mike Signer.

Here I think of the words we heard so often from Bobby Kennedy, derived from George Bernard Shaw:

There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

It is not that Mike Signer evokes the kind of inspiration that others got from Bobby, or from his older brother Jack, or perhaps more recently from Barack Obama. I would not argue that. But I would suggest that his willingness to engage in ideas invites the participation of others.

It is that participation, that broadening of who gets to speak to the possibilities of new and different ways of doing things, which excites me about Mike Signer. And that is why, for whatever value my words may carry, I announce my support of his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for Lieutenant Governor of Virginia.

I am FOR Mike. I am NOT against his opponents, all of whom I admire and respect. And should any of them win the nomination, that person would have my full and enthusiastic support against Bill Bolling’s attempt for another term as a Republican Lt. Gov.

I also acknowledge that at the moment I write these words, Mike is not favored to win the primary. That plays no part in my decision, which is based solely on my reaction to the things I have observed and ascertained by watching Mike, reading his book, talking with him, and talking with people who have known him far longer than the brief period I have known him.

So take my words as you choose. That’s your decision. My decision is to make a public declaration of support for Mike Signer. I have now done so.

Peace.

Offered for your consideration

Many people often do not pay attention to the office of Lt. Governor. In Virginia we do not have a ticket for the top two spots. Thus it is possible to get people of different parties. That warrants some attention.

Of greater importance for me is what I perceive as the unique set of skills that Mike Signer brings to this race. Although I expected to stay neutral, once I began to get to know Mike, I found myself increasingly drawn to his candidacy, and wanting to advocate on his behalf. I decided therefore I not only should support him, but also explain why.

Hence this diary.

Peace.

I am extremely impressed with Signer

I'm going to hold off on any more endorsements for a while. :)

why, did you apply for a job with Bowerbank?

Sorry, couldn't resist. :-)

I can understand people who may decide not to choose yet. After all, in theory at least other candidates could get into the races.

But I have seen enough out of the four currently running for LG to be able to make a choice, and actively help that choice.

Remember- I am FOR Mike, not against the others.

And I have already encouraged Mike to come here for a live blog. That will not be before April, since between now and March 31 the top priority for everyone is raising $$$.

Peace.

maybe a bit too soon

but thanks for the levity, and the well-written diary.

Reservations

I expressed these in another comment under an aznew diary about Signer. But I will reiterate them here. What he has said is definitely appealing from a policy perspective. But I think he is setting goals for himself in that office that will not be achievable given the constraints of the office, his own time, and the time of his staff. Putting too much on your plate gives me the reservation that you may not be able to effectively set priorities. Because remember: if everything is important, nothing is important.

Second, I worry that this would create the precedent of a shadow governor. Much of what he wants to do are all responsibilities of the office of Governor and/or the Governor's appointees. And if not Governor, then they are the responsibilities of the General Assembly. I don't want Bill Bolling trying to undermine Tim Kaine's initiatives. I didn't elect Bolling to govern the state. I prefer Bolling stick to his role of affable Baptist Deacon.

Last, the role of Lt Governor is to be ready to assume the role of Governor if it is necessary (besides the other thumb-twiddling constitutional role of presiding over the Senate). That being the case, I would think we would want someone who has some managerial experience. What should give me comfort that Mr. Signer could manage the entirety of state government should he be required to?

what major management experience did

Chuck Robb or Doug Wilder have?

we have never had to replace a gov w/an LG

Mike ran the statewide voter protection efforts

he has worked in both the Governor's office and the state legislature

and having an independent effort to generate policy ideas, whether or not the LG is of same party w/governor, does nothing directly to undercut gov. In fact, it enables more people to participate in the process

And I remind you - the office is elected independently, which implies some room for independent activity

A few things in response

I don't know whether you are trying to make the point that management experience should not be a qualifying factor or whether you are saying that Mr. Signer has that experience from the things you list. If you could clarify that, it would be helpful.

To your point about generating different policy ideas, my understanding from the Coffee Breaks is that he wants to go well beyond that. In the job creation Coffee Break, he is saying he has a plan to generate thousands of job. And that would be through directing funds from the federal stimulus package. So that is more than inviting a few activists into his office to have a chat about policy. And it very well could undercut the Governor's efforts if they are not moving in the same direction.

You don't have to remind me that it is independently elected. I think everyone who frequents a political blog in Virginia understand that. From a VA constitutional perspective though, independent as the office may be, it is not afforded many duties:

The Lieutenant Governor shall be President of the Senate but shall have no vote except in case of an equal division. He shall receive for his services a compensation to be prescribed by law, which shall not be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected.

Looking at the current Lt Governor's educational page, it appears that the office is a vestige of colonial rule when the Governors were away or didn't show up. I can't say that I know too much about the history of this office. But it seem like they were just looking for someone to fill in should the Governor not be able to perform their duties. I don't know that they were looking for an independent actor to countermand acts/policies of the Governor. And that would be fitting with the design of the Office of Vice President.

This is beside the point, but I think it is silly we even elect this office. If we must have a Lt. Governor, then it should be someone that the gubernatorial candidate selects as a running mate. It just leads to ridiculous results like our current situation. Virginians wanted a Democrat, Tim Kaine, to be governor. But in the event that Kaine could not serve out his term, they wanted Republican Bill Bolling, whose views are very divergent from Kaine's, to be his backup. That makes a whole lot of sense. In making this decision, I would prefer to know who the gubernatorial candidate endorses for Lt Governor. That would probably have the greatest weight on who I end up voting for. It makes sense to me that they have someone they like and work well with as the number 2. So, on this aside, have any of the gubernatorial candidates expressed their feelings about the Lt. Governor candidates?

You make a good argument

for revisiting the Virginia constitution and how it prescribes the installment of a Lt. Governor. Or whatever mechanism gave us this system - I honestly don't know where it came from. While that's a reasonable idea, it's certainly not on the table for the 2009 election cycle - which leaves us with the necessity to choose a Lt. Governor ourselves.

I doubt we'll get much guidance from the the gubernatorial candidate for two reasons.

First, we don't know who that will be, so at best each of us could pick our favorite gov candidate and then vote for their top lt pick - a pseudo gov/lt. gov pairing that runs on the honor system. But we obviously can't give the gov nominee his choice because by the time we know who that gov candidate is, it'll be too late to pick the "right" lt. gov.

Second, and more importantly, it's fairly unlikely that the gubernatorial candidates will actually make a choice because then they'll have painted themselves into a corner if their choice doesn't win. It would make for some ugly campaigning if the Lt. Gov candidate knew he/she was not really welcome. Same goes the other way around - I don't think we'll hear who the Lt Gov candidates want to win the gov primary.

So, I agree with your points, but unfortunately I think we're all going to be on our own to pick our favorite for the lt. gov primary (and the general - but that's an easier choice for most people).

I LIKE MIKE!

also... I'm on his bandwagon too. Not sure how much support a knucklehead like me can provide. But I am committed to do what I can out here Valley. I just have this thing for smart people, call me crazy, but I like to have bright young folks like Mike joining the fray. He's a refreshing antidote to the depressing drivel from Va Grand Old Party of No and Slow.